Purpose: The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the influence of gingival tissue thickness oncrestal bone loss around dental implants after a 1-year follow-up.

Materials and Methods:Forty-siximplants (23 test and 23 control) were placed in 19 patients. The test implants were placed about 2 mm supracrestally, whereas the control implants were positioned at the bone level. Before implant placement, the tissue thickness at implant sites was measured with a periodontal probe. After healing,metal-ceramic cement-retained prostheses were constructed. According to tissue thickness, the test implants were divided into A (thin) and B (thick) groups. Intraoral radiographs were performed andcrestal bone changes were measured at implant placement and after 1 year.

Results: Mean bone lossaround the test implants in group A (thin mucosa) was 1.61 ± 0.24 mm (SE; range, 0.9 to 3.3 mm) onthe mesial and 1.28 ± 0.167 mm (range, 0.8 to 2.1 mm) on the distal. Mean bone loss in test group B(thick mucosa) implants was 0.26 ± 0.08 mm (range, 0.2 to 0.9 mm) on the mesial aspect and 0.09 ±0.05 mm (range, 0.2 to 0.6 mm) on the distal aspect. Mean bone loss around control implants was 1.8 ±0.164 mm (range, 0.6 to 4.0 mm) and 1.87 ± 0.166 mm (range, 0.0 to 4.1 mm) on the mesial and distalaspects, respectively. Analysis of variance revealed a significant difference in terms of bone lossbetween test A (thin) and B (thick) groups on both the mesial and the distal.

Conclusion: Initial gingivaltissue thickness at the crest may be considered as a significant influence on marginal bone stability around implants. If the tissue thickness is 2.0 mm or less, crestal bone loss up to 1.45 mm may occur,despite a supracrestal position of the implant-abutment interface.INTJ ORALMAXILLOFACIMPLANTS2009;24:712–719

Key words:biologic width, crestal bone loss, dental implants, microgap, mucosal thickness.

Read full article HERE.